On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, David Mosberger wrote: > Since most other Linux platforms which use HZ>100 use a HZ value of > 1000, I'm thinking it may be safer to switch ia64 to HZ=1000 as well > (principle of least difference possible is generally a good one...). > > In the past, I was concerned that there might be enough code that > divides by HZ that this might not be such a hot idea, but I think this > may not (or at least no longer) be the case: I compiled the same > kernel once with HZ=1000 and once with HZ=1024 and the code-size > actually shrunk. > > What do others think?
I think its not a big issue and may still be beneficial if occasions arise where one has to divide by HZ. Do you know why the code size is reduced? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
