On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 2:25 pm, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:22:56 -0800, Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> said: > > Jesse> On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 2:20 pm, David Mosberger > > Jesse> wrote: > >> In my opinion, an EFI-based system should respect the > >> attribute-restrictions specified in the memory-map. > > Jesse> That makes sense to me. Seems like we could use a whole new > Jesse> arch abstraction for setting memory attributes (wc and > Jesse> uncached at the very least) on page ranges, but that's a much > Jesse> bigger task. > > Absolutely. Perhaps it would make sense to clean this up once the > hot-plug stuff has settled down?
Sounds good, though that could be a long wait. Should we add this new EFI call anyway? Seems like it'll be useful regardless... Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
