>>>>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:24:02 -0800, James E Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> said:
James> On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 13:56, James E Wilson wrote:
>> However, rather than add more ITANIUM_BSTEP_SPECIFIC support to
>> the kernel, I think it makes more sense to obsolete it and remove
>> it.
James> Here is the change I am suggesting.
Looks fine to me. I found one more reference to
CONFIG_ITANIUM_BSTEP_SPECIFIC in arch/ia64/configs/bigsur_defconfig.
Not that it really matters, but from a cleanliness perspective, we may
want to get rid of that at the same time.
I would have done it myself but there was no "Signed-off-by" trailer
in your patch so I think you may need to resend the patch anyhow
before Tony will take it (unless he judges the patch to be trivial
enough not to need this).
--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
