Andrew Morton wrote:    [Fri Feb 04 2005, 06:39:44AM EST]
> Bob Picco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Well I was seeing the same problem with 2.6.11-rc2-mm1-mhp1.  
> >  This fixed it for me.  I thought a patch had been sent upstream to Tony.
> >  I'm not proposing this as a patch.  I believe it was already done.
> > 
> >  bob
> > 
> > 
> >  diff -ruNp -X /home/picco/losl/dontdiff 
> > linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1-mhp1-orig/arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S 
> > linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1-mhp1/arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S
> >  --- linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1-mhp1-orig/arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S        
> > 2005-01-26 15:29:06.000000000 -0500
> >  +++ linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1-mhp1/arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S     2005-01-27 
> > 14:30:41.000000000 -0500
> >  @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ dont_preserve_current_frame:
> >     shladd in0=loc1,3,r17
> >     mov in1=0
> >     ;;
> >  -  .align 32
> >  +  TEXT_ALIGN(32)
> >   rse_clear_invalid:
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_ITANIUM
> >     // cycle 0
> 
> That's already in Linus's tree.  And mine.  So it's something else.
> 
> Were you seeing the same oops?
> 
I was seeing the one in create_elf_tables.  So this doesn't sound the same
as your problem.  Sorry.

bob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to