Hi Luck, On Wed, 09 Mar 2005, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >On Wednesday, March 9, 2005 11:31 am, Luck, Tony wrote: > >> Yes, tiger builds ok with SMP=n (if you pull from the > >> linux-ia64-test-2.6.12 you'll also gets Bjorn's fix to > >iosapic so the the > >> resulting kernel will boot, rather than hang). > >> > >> There are still problems with building the generic kernel with SMP=n > > > >I thought we had worked all these out awhile ago? I assume you're merging > >all > >this stuff as fast as you can now that 2.6.12 is open? Or do > >you need me to resend? If so, let me know when you've got the bulk of your > >queue merged and I can fix things up, rediff and resend. > > I'm trying to not go "as fast as I can" this time around ... I'm > aiming for better review and test of stuff as I put it in (to avoid > at least some of the messes that I made before). > > At the moment I'm skimming backwards and forwards through the > backlog picking stuff and loading it into linux-ia64-test-2.6.12 > tree. I'm going to try to be more systematic about routing > patches through the test tree before moving them into the release > tree. > > I have little hope that the SMP=n,GENERIC patches will still apply > by the time I get back to them ... so a re-diffed fix would be > appreciated (in a couple of weeks when the backlog has drained). > Let me know when the SMP=n,GENERIC patches have been push into mainline and I will add a build run for it on the ia64 autobuild: http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/kerncomp/ Darren > -Tony -------------------------------------------------- Darren Williams <dsw AT gelato.unsw.edu.au> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <www.gelato.unsw.edu.au> -------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
