Hi Tony,
This patch against ia64-test-2.6.12 fixes a bug where the tiocx code
was inadvertently un-doing some address modifications done in earlier
fixup code. This patch just removes the offending code.
Please accept.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Losure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks,
-Bruce
Index: tiocx-test-2.6.12/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/tiocx.c
===================================================================
--- tiocx-test-2.6.12.orig/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/tiocx.c 2005-03-23
18:49:50.585780038 -0600
+++ tiocx-test-2.6.12/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/tiocx.c 2005-03-23
18:56:06.670621925 -0600
@@ -330,19 +330,6 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tiocx_dma_addr);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tiocx_swin_base);
-static uint64_t tiocx_get_hubdev_info(u64 handle, u64 address)
-{
-
- struct ia64_sal_retval ret_stuff;
- ret_stuff.status = 0;
- ret_stuff.v0 = 0;
-
- ia64_sal_oemcall_nolock(&ret_stuff,
- SN_SAL_IOIF_GET_HUBDEV_INFO,
- handle, address, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
- return ret_stuff.v0;
-}
-
static void tio_conveyor_set(nasid_t nasid, int enable_flag)
{
uint64_t ice_frz;
@@ -477,18 +464,12 @@
if (nasid & 0x1) { /* TIO's are always odd */
struct hubdev_info *hubdev;
- uint64_t status;
struct xwidget_info *widgetp;
DBG("Found TIO at nasid 0x%x\n", nasid);
hubdev =
(struct hubdev_info *)(NODEPDA(cnodeid)->pdinfo);
- status =
- tiocx_get_hubdev_info(nasid,
- (uint64_t) __pa(hubdev));
- if (status)
- continue;
widgetp = &hubdev->hdi_xwidget_info[TIOCX_CORELET];
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
