> > No ... I saw it too without gcc-4.  See 
> http://tinyurl.com/clzbu where I
> > identified the patch that seems to be the cause.
> 
> Patch below fixes the problem.  Moral of the story: don't add
> "attributed(packed)" lightly!

IIRC as of gcc3.2, attribute(packed) on ia64 meant roughly the
equivalent of specifying "generate the worst case possible
code even for things that are aligned".  Is that still the
case in gcc-4?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to