Christoph wrote:
> This is an implementation that deals with monitoring and managing running
> processes.
So is this patch roughly equivalent to adding a pid to the
mbind/set_mempolicy/get_mempolicy system calls?
Not that I am advocating for or against adding doing that. But this
seems like alot of code, with new and exciting API details, just to
add a pid argument, if such it be.
Andi - could you remind us all why you chose not to have a pid argument
in these calls?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
