Ashok Raj wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 06:20:51PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
This patch add the code to handle the relationship between cpu and
domains. We need more consideration about how to separate vector
domains.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Should we consider this based on some mach-* like schemes, so for e.g in
NUMA case we could use node as a VECTOR_DOMAIN? ... or maybe we could
somehow tie this into CPUSETS?..
I think some hardware implements hardware interrupt
redirection on each node. For such system, I think it
is good idea to use NUMA node as a VECTOR_DOMAIN to
make it possible to use hardware interrupt redirection.
Currently I don't have other reasons to use the set of
processors as a vector domain instead of per-CPU approach.
Does anyone have other reasons to use other approach than
per-CPU approach?
Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
