>On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:00:56PM -0700, david mosberger wrote: >> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22605 > >> Dan, do you want to take a quick look to see if anything obvious is >> wrong in that area? > >Did anyone end up deciding if the kernel or the simulator should be >fixed? I'd like the simulator autobuild to "just work" with gcc4 >without having to copy in an old bootloader or something.
And behind door number 3 is to fix the compiler ... but that also seems to be contentious (and doesn't help people who are already using gcc4). Is the simulator in error by only half loading when the structure is on a 4-byte boundary ... if so, then my 2nd choice would be to fix it there. But ... since the fix is small, I could put it into the kernel as a last resort to get things working again. Do you really need to align(16)? Or would (8) do? A comment mentioning that this is a workaround for a compiler and/or simulator issue would be good. -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
