Due to its apparent obviousness, I'm afraid I'm missing something, but isn't it incorrect that lib/swiotlb.c:swiotlb_sync_sg() calls sync_single() with sg->dma_address simply cast to void* rather than going through phys_to_virt()?
Also, for ia64, isn't mark_clean() violating its own comment, i.e. to mark only *complete* pages? And then, for completeness, isn't swiotlb_sync_sg() missing the call to mark_clean()? Thanks, Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
