Bernhard Walle wrote:
Hello Jes,
* Jes Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-27 07:28]:
"Bernhard" == Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bernhard> printk(KERN_NOTICE "Kdump not configured\n");
Wouldn't it make more sense to make that messages a bit more
descriptive? Ie. include something about what it tried to do when it
noticed it wasn't configured?
Do you think
machine_kdump_on_init(): kdump not configured
would be better? That would make it easier to find the position of the
message in code. Or did you think of a more verbal description like
That would do just fine I think, anything to avoid having to run find
and grep on the tree to figure out where it came from :)
Cheers,
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
