Unwinding a running task has proven problematic.

In one instance, the running task was attempting to unwind itself and
received an interrupt between when get_wchan allocated local variables on
the stack and when unw_init_from_blocked_task was called which resulted
in unw_init_frame_info to place this tasks task_struct pointer over the
switch stack's ar_bspstore entry.

Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Index: linux-tot-20070517/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-tot-20070517.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c  2007-05-18 
10:14:45.485516967 -0500
+++ linux-tot-20070517/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c       2007-05-18 
10:15:10.340573728 -0500
@@ -763,6 +763,9 @@ get_wchan (struct task_struct *p)
        unsigned long ip;
        int count = 0;
 
+       if (!p || p == current || p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
+               return 0;
+
        /*
         * Note: p may not be a blocked task (it could be current or
         * another process running on some other CPU.  Rather than
@@ -773,6 +776,8 @@ get_wchan (struct task_struct *p)
         */
        unw_init_from_blocked_task(&info, p);
        do {
+               if (p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
+                       return 0;
                if (unw_unwind(&info) < 0)
                        return 0;
                unw_get_ip(&info, &ip);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to