> > I'm guessing here ... I haven't cross-checked with the architects.
>
> I'll be glad if we can get a comment from Intel's architects.
I talked this through with an architect, and I'm right. In the
sequence:
ld4.acq rM = [rN]
;;
mov rP = ar.itc
there are no dependencies, so the read of ar.itc can occur
"IMMEDIATELY after the load issues".
Consuming the result of the load in between will create a
dependency ... so the timestamp will be taken as we want it,
after the load.
So I can apply this patch (moving the "and r28 = ~1,r28").
What other time patches are you still pushing? The time
interpolator changes that were predicted still look like
they are pending somewhere (kernel/timer.c hasn't been
changed).
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
