Bob Picco wrote:
@@ -214,61 +209,56 @@ ENTRY(fsys_gettimeofday)
 :
        movl r27 = xtime
 :
 .time_redo:
-       .pred.rel.mutex p8,p9,p10
-       ld4.acq r28 = [r29]     // xtime_lock.sequence. Must come first for 
locking purposes
+       ld4.acq r28 = [r20]     // gtod_lock.sequence, Must be first in struct
 :
        ld8 r8 = [r27],-IA64_TIMESPEC_TV_NSEC_OFFSET    // xtime.tv_nsec
 :
-       ld4 r10 = [r29]         // xtime_lock.sequence
+       ld4 r10 = [r20]         // gtod_lock.sequence, old xtime_lock.sequence
 :
        cmp4.ne.or p7,p0 = r28,r10
-(p7)   br.cond.dpnt.few .time_redo     // sequence number changed ?
+(p7)   br.cond.dpnt.few .time_redo     // sequence number changed, outer loop2

This patch removes locking xtime_lock but the code still reads xtime.

Since gtod_lock.sequence will not tell us whether xtime is updated
(or going to be updated) while in this window, the result may be wrong...


        // r29 = address of seqlock
 :
-       movl r20 = time_interpolator
+       movl r20 = fsyscall_gtod_data // load fsyscall gettimeofday data address
        ;;
-       ld8 r20 = [r20]         // get pointer to time_interpolator structure
-       movl r29 = xtime_lock
-       ld4 r2 = [r2]           // process work pending flags
+       add r29 = IA64_ITC_JITTER_OFFSET,r20

It seems that the comment doesn't match to current usage.


Thanks,
H.Seto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to