> pci_set_mwi() is an advisory thing, and on certain platforms it might fail
> to set the cacheline size to the desired number.  This is not a fatal error
> and the driver can successfully run at a lesser performance level.

Correct.

> If that description is accurate then I'd contend that pci_set_mwi() is
> misdesigned.  It should not be returning a negative error code for
> something which is not an error.

It is an error to *some* drivers but not all. Kind of like setting some
of the other features may be essential for some chips and not others.

> And we *need* to be excessively anal in the PCI setup code.  We have metric
> shitloads of bugs due to problems in that area, and the more formality and
> error handling and error reporting we can get in there the better off we
> will be.

No argument there

If we want to deal with some of the mess we should also remove all direct
writing of PCI latency timers and replace them with a function to stop
drivers setting unsafe values and ignoring chip errata the core knows
about but they dont
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to