Hi,
On Monday 05 November 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Factor out ata_eh_schedule_probe() from ata_eh_handle_dev_fail() and
> ata_eh_recover(). This is to improve maintainability and make future
> changes easier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> index ed8813b..a37be1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> @@ -2438,6 +2438,22 @@ static int ata_eh_skip_recovery(struct ata_link *link)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static int ata_eh_schedule_probe(struct ata_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct ata_eh_context *ehc = &dev->link->eh_context;
> +
> + if (!(ehc->i.probe_mask & (1 << dev->devno)) ||
> + (ehc->did_probe_mask & (1 << dev->devno)))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ata_eh_detach_dev(dev);
> + ata_dev_init(dev);
> + ehc->did_probe_mask |= (1 << dev->devno);
> + ehc->i.action |= ATA_EH_SOFTRESET;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int ata_eh_handle_dev_fail(struct ata_device *dev, int err)
> {
> struct ata_eh_context *ehc = &dev->link->eh_context;
> @@ -2469,16 +2485,9 @@ static int ata_eh_handle_dev_fail(struct ata_device
> *dev, int err)
> if (ata_link_offline(dev->link))
> ata_eh_detach_dev(dev);
>
> - /* probe if requested */
> - if ((ehc->i.probe_mask & (1 << dev->devno)) &&
> - !(ehc->did_probe_mask & (1 << dev->devno))) {
> - ata_eh_detach_dev(dev);
> - ata_dev_init(dev);
> -
> + /* schedule probe if necessary */
> + if (ata_eh_schedule_probe(dev))
> ehc->tries[dev->devno] = ATA_EH_DEV_TRIES;
> - ehc->did_probe_mask |= (1 << dev->devno);
> - ehc->i.action |= ATA_EH_SOFTRESET;
> - }
>
> return 1;
> } else {
> @@ -2555,14 +2564,8 @@ int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap,
> ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
> if (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_DETACH)
> ata_eh_detach_dev(dev);
>
> - if (!ata_dev_enabled(dev) &&
> - ((ehc->i.probe_mask & (1 << dev->devno)) &&
> - !(ehc->did_probe_mask & (1 << dev->devno)))) {
> - ata_eh_detach_dev(dev);
> - ata_dev_init(dev);
> - ehc->did_probe_mask |= (1 << dev->devno);
> - ehc->i.action |= ATA_EH_SOFTRESET;
> - }
> + /* schedule probe if necessary */
> + ata_eh_schedule_probe(dev);
!ata_dev_enabled() got lost, is this intended?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
