On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:54:03 +0300
Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude 
> > linux.vanilla-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c 
> > linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c
> > --- linux.vanilla-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c     
> > 2008-01-19 14:47:56.000000000 +0000
> > +++ linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c     2008-01-19 
> > 15:00:08.000000000 +0000
> > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
> >  static u8 __devinit pdc2026x_old_cable_detect(ide_hwif_t *hwif)
> >  {
> >     struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(hwif->dev);
> > -   u16 CIS = 0, mask = (hwif->channel) ? (1<<11) : (1<<10);
> > +   u16 CIS, mask = (hwif->channel) ? (1<<11) : (1<<10);
> >  
> >     pci_read_config_word(dev, 0x50, &CIS);
> 
>     Since we ignore the result of this function, if it fails CIS may be left 
> uninitialized if the function fails. So, the initializer is not as useless as 
> it seems (and there's a lot more of such cases in drivers/ide/pci/ :-)..

If pci_read_config_word fails you are in very deep doodoo anyway. I don't
think anyone checks it because there isn't an answer to "now what"

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to