On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 04:33:29PM +0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> It is not using scsi emulation. It is using the scsi subsystem in
> the linux kernel instead of the ide subsystem. More and more
> drivers are being written for "libata". And less and less in this
> is actually SATA specific anymore. That is why we are starting
> to see drivers that drive both sata and pata (promise for instance
> in the libata-dev tree). Also note that if I understand correctly
> libata will ultimately not use the scsi subsystem but the block
> subsystem (that doesn't really exist yet). The way I see it
Thanks for explanation. Hopefully it will happen soon :)

> libata is the new way to do it right, and in which you can fit
> any pata and/or sata driver. My personal goal is when we can
> have one name-space between scsi and [sp]ata but that's not
> here yet with many drivers only existing for the old/normal
> ide susbystem, but that might/will change.
> 
That would be a good thing. Especially if cdrecord/smartctl/hdparm was
ported to it so that it could use all features of the drive
independently of the bus to which it is connected.

Thanks

Michal Suchanek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to