I happened to catch an oops this time, here it is:
sata_sil version 0.8
ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xE09FC080 ctl 0xE09FC08A bmdma 0xE09FC000 irq 11
ata2: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xE09FC0C0 ctl 0xE09FC0CA bmdma 0xE09FC008 irq 11
irq 11: nobody cared!
[<c012fbea>] __report_bad_irq+0x2a/0x90
[<c012f5a0>] handle_IRQ_event+0x30/0x70
[<c012fcdc>] note_interrupt+0x6c/0xd0
[<c012f710>] __do_IRQ+0x130/0x160
[<c01042b9>] do_IRQ+0x19/0x30
[<c010289a>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[<c0117830>] __do_softirq+0x30/0x90
[<c01178b6>] do_softirq+0x26/0x30
[<c012f564>] irq_exit+0x34/0x40
[<c01042be>] do_IRQ+0x1e/0x30
[<c010289a>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[<c01005f0>] default_idle+0x0/0x30
[<c0100613>] default_idle+0x23/0x30
[<c010068a>] cpu_idle+0x3a/0x60
[<c03ca767>] start_kernel+0x147/0x160
[<c03ca360>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1b0
handlers:
[<c0273770>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x70)
[<e0975580>] (snd_ice1712_interrupt+0x0/0x250 [snd_ice1712])
[<e0a65460>] (ata_interrupt+0x0/0x1c0 [libata])
Disabling IRQ #11
ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:346b 83:7f21 84:4003 85:3469 86:3c01 87:4003 88:203f
ata1: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/100, 390721968 sectors: lba48
Rasmus Melgaard wrote:
Well I had no problems in windows either! ... try loading bios setup defaults settings or/and upgrade bios.
/rasmus
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 07:18, Doug McLain wrote:
In my case the MB is an A7N8X, and that option is nowhere to be found in my bios. My hardware lockup only occurs in linux, and the drive works fine in windows. Also, if I load the sil_sata driver with the drive not attatched, it loads fine, as reported by the others as well. Only if the drive is attatched, does a hard lock occur after a modprobe.
Thanks anyway
Rasmus Melgaard wrote:
Hi,
I had problems with the sata_sil (pci sil3112) at boot time, the problem was bios settings for the PCI bus. I disabled 'BYTE MERGE' on my Asus A7V board and i worked.
Rasmus
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 06:03, Doug McLain wrote:
Any word on this? It's been reported here a few times now.
I am having exactly the same problem, the only difference being the model of drive. Mine is a WD2000. The sata_sil module loads ok though, if the drive is not connected. If it is connected, hard lock. Tested on 2.4.25, 2.6.9, 2.6.10.
Doug
Encapsulated message
Re: sata_sil problems (lockup at boottime)
From: Doug McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gerald Hopf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
Date: 2005-01-10 16:34
Gerald Hopf wrote:
Hello everyone,
i'm having some really strange problems with the sata_sil driver.
My hardware: Asus A7N8X Deluxe Rev 1.x with onboard Sil3112 Controller - Samsung SP1614C SATA Harddrive - for further testing : PATA to SATA Adapter that came with an ABIT Mainboard
What i'm trying to accomplish: i'm trying to use this Samsung SATA harddrive in my Linux Fileserver:
When the Silicon Image Controller is enabled (it can be disabled by a jumper) and no harddrive is connected, everything boots fine. If i connect a harddrive, i get the following message (exact messages change slightly) while booting:
- - - - - START - - - - - ====================== [<c0102716>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 [<c0117d70>] __do_softirq+0x30/0x90 [<c0104261>] do_softirq+0x41/0x50 ====================== [<c012d0a4>] irq_exit+0x34/0x40 [<c0104165>] do_IRQ+9x45/0x60 [<c0102716>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 [<c010c674>] delay_tsc+0x14/0x20 [<c025efd2>] __delay+0x12/0x20 [<c02d7290>] ata_pio_complet+0xe0/0x1f0 [<c02d7a95>] ata_pio_test+0x95/0xb0 [<c01229bc>] worker_thread+0x1cc/0x290 [<c02d7a00>] ata_pio_task+0x0/0xb0 [<c0110160>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20 [<c0110160>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20 [<c01227f0>] worker_thread+0x0/0x290 [<c0126ca5>] kthread+0xa5/0xb0 [<c0126c00>] kthread+0x0/0xb0 [<c01006f1>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x14 handlers: [<c02d82b0>] (ata_interrupt+0x0/0x1c0) Disabling IRQ #11 ata: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/100, 361882080 sectors: lba 48 _ - - - - - END - - - - -
This happens with both the Samsung SP1614C "native" SATA drive, as well as with an IBM 180GB PATA drive, using a PATA-to-SATA Adapter. So i'm not sure whether this is harddrive dependent, but at least it doesn't look like it...
This problem has been there in all of the latest 2.6.X kernel revisions. I'm currently using 2.6.10-rc3 (which came out today), but i've allready had this problem in 2.6.9 and 2.6.8 and probably even 2.6.7 if i remember correctly.
I tried quite a lot to get rid of those problems, including: - Flashing a new/different Bios (even with different versions of the Silicon Image SATA Bios part: 4.2.47 and 4.2.50) - Disabling APIC in the Bios, compiling Kernel with or without APIC - Changing the IRQ of the Controller by reserving IRQ#11 in the Bios - Disabling allmost every other onboard device i could, including serial/parallel/usb/firewire/3com lan (and there are no PCI/Addon cards besides an nvidia geforce2mx agp card installed in this pc anyway!) - Connecting drives to both ports
I found the following discussions which might be related to what i'm experiencing, but noone seems to have a solution. Some seem to suggest it worked fine till 2.6.5: (The first two seem to be most related, i'm not so sure of the third one) http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-26543.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128180 http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-23028.html
Screenshots of the error messages can be found here: http://www.nv-systems.net/pics/lkml/sata_sil1.jpg <-- the one from above http://www.nv-systems.net/pics/lkml/sata_sil2.jpg <-- with samsung instead of ibm http://www.nv-systems.net/pics/lkml/sata_sil3.jpg <-- the screen just before the problem
Is there ANYTHING i can do (except buying a promise controller) ?
Yours sincerely, Gerald
I am having exactly the same problem, the only difference being the model of drive. Mine is a WD2000. The sata_sil module loads ok though, if the drive is not connected. If it is connected, hard lock. Tested on 2.4.25, 2.6.9, 2.6.10.
Doug
-- http://nostar.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
End of encapsulated message
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- http://nostar.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
