On Apr 5, 2005 11:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > kiu wrote: > > Hi ide team, > > > > i often heard "uh, since kernel 2.6.bla the ide perfomance is soo bad". > > Because of that (and the joy of writing bash scripts noone else will > > understand > > *g*) i wrote an automated test script to get comparable measurements. > > > > The script compiles 2.6.0-2.6.11.6 (yes "" | make oldconfig), boots each > > kernel, > > runs hdparm/bonnie++ and create some pngs with gnuplot. > > > > I ran the script on a Intel 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4/PIICeleron > > 333/IC35L040AVER07 > > machine and you can find the results here: > > > > http://www.kiu.weite-welt.com/misc/idetest > > > > I am quite busy at the moment and hopefully have time next month to clean > > up the > > scripts for a release (are you interested?) and do further testing... > > This looks like a mixed bag: some regression, some clear improvements, > mostly the same. Nice work! > > Does this portray the IDE situation or more the situation of the PIIX > chipset - I guess the code isn't changed as much since it should be > rather mature?
Probably the situation of VM code... Having scripts at hand would be useful to double check that testing procedure itself is OK. Bartlomiej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
