On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:12:54AM +0200, Marc Bevand wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: > | Hello, Marc. > | > | To eliminate one more possibility, can you please try the following > | patch? > | > | diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c > | --- a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c > | +++ b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c > | @@ -720,6 +720,8 @@ static int sil24_init_one(struct pci_dev > | pci_name(pdev)); > | } > | > | + writel(0x0300, port + PORT_SCONTROL); > | + > | /* Zero error counters. */ > | writel(0x8000, port + PORT_DECODE_ERR_THRESH); > | writel(0x8000, port + PORT_CRC_ERR_THRESH); > > I tried that. No changes. > > | diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h > > It looks like your patch has been truncated: what did you want > to modify in libata.h ?
Nothing. Only timestamp has changed and 'git diff' still ran diff on it, so the empty diff for libata.h. > PS: I am going to test a 32-bit kernel later in the day. I'll backport new sil24 to sil24-original tree so that we can eliminate all other factors and compare two drivers again to find the offending difference. I'm currently in the middle of something so it may take me a day or so. Thanks. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
