Alan Cox wrote:
> - Use of cable_detect method
> - ata_pci_default_filter needed on PATA100 ops
> - Filter for UDMA 133 errata from vendor (not enabled in this diff but
> added ready)
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
<snip>
>
> /**
> + * pdc2720x_mode_filter - mode selection filter
> + * @adev: ATA device
> + * @mask: list of modes proposed
> + *
> + * Block UDMA on devices that cause trouble with this controller.
> + */
> +
> +static unsigned long pdc2027x_mode_filter(struct ata_device *adev, unsigned
> long mask)
> +{
> + unsigned char model_num[ATA_ID_PROD_LEN + 1];
> + struct ata_device *pair = ata_dev_pair(adev);
> +
> + if (adev->class != ATA_DEV_ATA || adev->devno == 0 || pair == NULL)
> + return ata_pci_default_filter(adev, mask);
> +
> + /* Check for slave of a Maxtor at UDMA6 */
> + ata_id_c_string(pair->id, model_num, ATA_ID_PROD,
> + ATA_ID_PROD_LEN + 1);
> + /* If the master is a maxtor in UDMA6 then the slave should not use
> UDMA 6 */
> + if(strstr(model_num, "Maxtor") == 0 && pair->dma_mode == XFER_UDMA_6)
> + mask &= ~ (1 << (6 + ATA_SHIFT_UDMA));
Some Maxtor drives have "Maxtor" while others have "MAXTOR" in the IDENTIFY
data.
Should we check both "Maxtor" and "MAXTOR" here?
--
albert
> +
> + return ata_pci_default_filter(adev, mask);
> +}
> +
> +/**
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
