Mark Lord wrote: > Roger While wrote: >> Is there any knob/option to prevent libata >> probing non-existent channels ? >> Specifically how can I stop the kernel probing >> the second SATA? - > .. >> <6>ata1.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 490234752 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/1) >> <6>ata1.00: ata1: dev 0 multi count 8 >> <6>ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 >> <6>scsi1 : ata_piix >> <4>ata2: port is slow to respond, please be patient (Status 0xff) >> <3>ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs, Status 0xff) >> <3>ata2: SRST failed (status 0xFF) >> <3>ata2: SRST failed (err_mask=0x100) >> <4>ata2: softreset failed, retrying in 5 secs >> <3>ata2: SRST failed (status 0xFF) >> <3>ata2: SRST failed (err_mask=0x100) >> <4>ata2: softreset failed, retrying in 5 secs >> <3>ata2: SRST failed (status 0xFF) >> <3>ata2: SRST failed (err_mask=0x100) >> <3>ata2: reset failed, giving up > .. > > Ugh. That could really slow down system startup. > > There is no parameter to avoid it, > just one to reduce the delay while it probes. Not ideal. > > But it really could be more clever here, and notice the 0xff patterns, > and have an early exit if there's obviously nothing attached. > > Or perhaps there's some register it could read to see if the > port was disabled in the BIOS (I'm betting it is still "enabled", > but it could be good to check if we don't already). > > Maybe just do it in the ata_piix subdriver. Tejun, Alan?
We do consider 0xff as port empty these days. Roger, which kernel version are you using? Can you give a shot at 2.6.20.7? -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
