Alan Cox wrote:
> It is legitimate (although annoying and silly) for a PCI IDE controller
> not to be assigned an interrupt and to be polled. The libata-sff code
> should therefore not try and request IRQ 0 in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
> linux.vanilla-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
> linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
> --- linux.vanilla-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c 2008-01-02
> 16:04:19.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c 2008-01-02
> 16:12:39.000000000 +0000
> @@ -808,7 +808,10 @@
> if (rc)
> goto err_out;
>
> - if (!legacy_mode) {
> + if (!legacy_mode && pdev->irq) {
> + /* We may have no IRQ assigned in which case we can poll. This
> + shouldn't happen on a sane system but robustness is cheap
> + in this case */
> rc = devm_request_irq(dev, pdev->irq, pi->port_ops->irq_handler,
> IRQF_SHARED, DRV_NAME, host);
> if (rc)
> @@ -816,7 +819,7 @@
>
> ata_port_desc(host->ports[0], "irq %d", pdev->irq);
> ata_port_desc(host->ports[1], "irq %d", pdev->irq);
> - } else {
> + } else if (legacy_mode) {
I would prefer to put if (pdev->irq) inside if (!legacy_mode) but that's
nothing major.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
