Bernd Schubert wrote: > Hello Tejun, > > On Tuesday 23 October 2007 10:08:01 you wrote: >> Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> Alan Cox wrote: >>>>> 2) Once we identified, over time, the set of drives affected by this >>>>> 3112 quirk (aka drives that didn't fully comply to SATA spec), the >>>>> debugging of corruption cases largely shifted to the standard >>>>> routine: update the BIOS, replace the >>>>> cables/RAM/power/mainboard/slot/etc. to be certain of problem location. >>>> Except for the continued series of later SI + Nvidia chipset (mostly) >>>> pattern which seems unanswered but also being later chips I assume >>>> unrelated to this problem. >>> The SIL_FLAG_MOD15WRITE flag is set in sil_port_info[] is set according >>> to the best info we have from SiI, which indicates that 3114 and 3512 do >>> not have the same problem as the 3112. >> I don't think this data corruption problem w/ sil3114 is related to >> m15w. m15w workaround slows down things quite a bit and is likely to >> hide problems on PCI bus side. There are reports of data corruption >> with 3114 on nvidia (most common), via and now amd chipsets. There's >> one on intel too but IIRC wasn't too definite. >> >> According to a user, freebsd didn't have data corruption problem on the >> same hardware. I copied PCI FIFO setup code (ours is broken BTW) but it >> didn't fix the problem. >> >> I'll try to reproduce the problem locally and hunt it down. > > the problem just came up here again, as you and Jeff already guessed also > with > the the workaround patches. > I guess you didn't find time to look into it yet? Is there anything I can do? > What would you have done after reproducing it?
Jeff, any progress on testing? -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
