Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't know we had digests in listar, I stand corrected,
They're badly composed (just all texts in a single message, instead of being
properly MIME-encapsulated). As a result, replying to a message in a digest is
quite a pain. BUT - egroups do this stupid thing, too :^)
> and header
> digests ARE smaller. they only list headers and links directly to the
> full messages in the archive. really useful IMHO.
I personally find header digests by and large useless, but it's MHO, too.
> so, once more, please visit the site, try to subscribe and play with the
> features. if no one objects, or maybe even decides it's the coolest
> thing since modular monolithic kernels, we can make the move in a week
> or two.
All in all, I'd vote for egroups, given we get the anti-spam feature. But who
can garantee their spam policy (or, in general, all service policies) won't
change in the future - like charging some money per email/KB/time period/list
etc?
Regards,
Evgeny
--
____________________________________________________________
/ Evgeny Stambulchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \
/ Plasma Laboratory, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel \ \
| Phone : (972)8-934-3610 == | == FAX : (972)8-934-3491 | |
| URL : http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/~fnevgeny/ | |
| Finger for PGP key >=====================================+ |
|______________________________________________________________|
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
