(asking for someone I know) Hi, Assuming the following setup: An office, running network 192.168.0.0/24. (all machines sittin' on a switch). A linux firewall, with 2 eth interfaces, eth0 connected to the LAN, eth1 connected to the ADSL thingie. (192.168.0.1 on eth0 towards LAN, 10.200.1.1 on the eth1, while the ppp0 is getting a static actcom address). Now, we wanna do NAT. So, we translate everything coming from 192.168.0.0/24 to the address of ppp0. The problem is that the second iptables goes up, the adsl connectivity to actcom crashes. I had a few theories (didn't have a chance to debug the problem in real time yet), among which is that the iptables may be actually dropping the connectivity between the eth1 interface (10.200.1.1) and the bezeq internal adsl network. Has anyone tried such a setup, with full NAT, using a static ip that you get from an adsl supplier (I assume the fact the IP is static or not doesn't matter here). --Ariel -- Ariel Biener e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP(6.5.8) public key http://www.tau.ac.il/~ariel/pgp.html ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
