|
Hi list. I run HD performance tests
on Linux (RH7.1, kernel 2.4.18-pre3-ac2). The test is quite simple: first, I
create a 2 Gb file filled
with 1-s, then I read it and measure the time needed for both read and write
operations. Tests run on 2 kinds of HDs: Barracuda
ATA IV (ST380021A) - 80Gb, and IBM Deskstar
DTLA-307076 - 75Gb. On Barracuda: It turned
that writing of 2Gb file takes between 72 and 74 sec, which is approximately
equals to 27Mg/sec. Reading of the same file would take between 122 and 133
sec, which corresponds to read performance between 15Mb to 16.3Mb per second. On IBM: Both write and read
performance would give about 27-29 Mb/sec. Both tests run on same
kernel and same OS version. DMA enabled. 32-bit transfer enabled. Does anyone know what could
be a problem? Why Seagate is so slow? Is it HD problem, or maybe some kernel
tuning would help? Seagate support people say
they don’t know anything about Linux-specific issues. Thanks Max. |
- Re: Seagate Barracuda. Maxim Kryachko
- Re: Seagate Barracuda. Max Kovgan
