Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 27 May 2002 15:45, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > Search TFA(rchives) - some of the "amuta" discussions were online, and > > some people with experience in running amutot voiced their thoughts > > and arguments pro and contra. > What gives you the "against"? Well, Hetz, will you please try and search that archives for both the "against" and the "for"? There were enough points "against" for a group of fairly intelligent people (unless we all got significantly smarter with the years) to reject the idea repeatedly. Now, I am not saying I am against, and I am hereby publicly stating that I am willing to start paying reasonable membership dues until I find out that the amuta is not worth it for one reason or another, but given the history of this idea I think we should first go over the reasons why it was rejected in the past, and verify that the reasons are no longer valid, or that there are now more arguments "pro" that outweigh the arguments "contra", and understand what has changed. Whoever takes this task upon him/herself and succeeds will be automatically nominated (not necessarily elected) the President. -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] If it aint't broken it hasn't got enough features yet. ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
