Hello, I had the exact same problem. Also, installing glibc didn't help. I'm kind of a newbie so I might do something wrong, although I did try making it work in every way I could think of. Another thing is that I managed to install the "normal" version of OO from their site, it's not an rpm but it does check to see if you have the correct version of gcc. Could it happen because the machine used to create the rpm was running RH 7.3 (mine is 7.2)? Should I install the latest version of gcc (I think it's 3.1) to make it work (it's not an rpm installation, and looks pretty complicated)? Thanks, Jonathan.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eliran > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 6:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OO: rpm libc error > > > Hello group, > I have finally managed to get Open Office. > I got both debs and rpms + the libstlport4.5.gcc3-4.5.3-5.i386.rpm. > When tried to install the package (rpm -ivh) I got a dependencies > message about GCC_3 and stuff, so I inserted my RH7.2 CD and installed > the appropriate rpms from both installation CD's. > > After installing all the required packages I left with one dependency: > > error: failed dependencies: > libc.so.6(GCC_3.0) is needed by bidi-openoffice.org-1.0.0-5 > > I looked for glibc and libc (or libcap in the cd's) but these versions > were already installed, and gcc3 was installed too. > > Before a minute I downloaded glibc-2.2.5-34.i386.rpm which suppose > to come with RH7.3 (from rpmfind.net) and in the html information > file I saw it *provides*: libc.so.6 > > When trying to install this glibc I see it needs glibc-common > which is 10 M ! (not enough bandwidth for it) > > Is it really important for me to download these ? > > In OO installation HTML file (downloaded from IGLU too) it > says that it > successfully compiled on RH7.1 , did other rpms required > installation too ? > > Regards, > Eliran > -- > <a href="http://www.rootshell.be/~eg";>Eliran</a> > > I replaced the headlights on my car with strobe lights. Now it looks > like I'm the only one moving. > -- Stephen Wright > > On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 06:37:06PM +0300, Eliran wrote: > > > > -- > > <a href="http://www.rootshell.be/~eg";>Eliran</a> > > > > The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and > > wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United > > States, as well as its interpretation by every major > commentator and > > court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates > > that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen > > to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner. > > -- Report of the Subcommittee On The Constitution > of the Committee On > > The Judiciary, United States Senate, 97th > Congress, second session > > (February, 1982), SuDoc# Y4.J 89/2: Ar 5/5 > > > > ================================================================= > > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > <a href="http://www.rootshell.be/~eg";>Eliran</a> > > A man with a gun is a citizen. A man without a gun is a subject. > > ================================================================= > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
