Hi Mark On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > The statistics become much higher when you realize that: > > 1. Redhat wants to change the buggy 2.96 compiler (which actually has about > > 5 versions I am ware of that they refuse to admit or tag as different > > versions). Please get some facts straight regarding gcc 2.96: http://www.bero.org/gcc296.html I get no response from the serve, try google's cache: http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:14MxugUNW6gC:www.bero.org/gcc296.html+bero+gcc+2.96&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 [snip] This is not an impartial person (Bero works for Redhat), but it will help you understand why redhat *needed* to fork gcc, and maybe why Mandrke decided that it was actually a good idea and followed it. -- Tzafrir Cohen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
