On 2002-10-29, Christoph Bugel wrote: > On 2002-10-29, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > We've had a thread recently about ccache and potential > > pitfalls. johnm on advogato has discovered one such pitfall. > > The details: > > > > http://www.advogato.org/person/johnm/diary.html?start=23 > > IIRC, ccache promises to produce the same results as the real > compiler *only* if the compiler itself has not changed. > > And IIRC, the heuristic to know if the compiler has changed is > simply to look at the timestamp of the compiler frontend > executable. > > So if, for example, gas was upgraded, or something similar, > ccache wil not know about it. So maybe it's a feature, not a > bug. Just guessing, didn't try to reproduce it.
But this still doesn't explain the warning dated from august.. ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
