On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Orr Dunkelman wrote:

> I think this should be done very carefully. 

I agree with the notes of Orr and would like to add a few more.

For each reported site there should be a short explanation in what way
is it broken and possibly a contact name who reported the problem.

As the broken site changes it should remain in the list and once the issue 
gets fixed it should be noted on the list of broken sites, just like in a 
bug tracking system.

This will let us see a progress. If there is one.

The owner/webmaster of the affected sites should also be contacted
and let him/her know about the problem and about the report.

Though this needs to be done even more carefully and with some thought
the one who reported the problem can also offer his/her help to fix that 
specific problem. So we won't only complain but will be creative and not 
only with the generic explanation but with specific help. 
Of course for this help you have the full right to charge money.


regards
   Gabor



=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to