Quoting Shoshannah Forbes, from the post of Wed, 22 Jan: > >I'm adore lynx. Am I fit into standards? > > If the site is built well, it should degrade gracefully. Lynx is not > 100% standard compliant, but standard sites work better with it then > non- standard ones.
I'm not sure how much better links is over lynks, but w3m excells over the two in tables, frames and doublebyte chars (I'm not into chinese, but I believe it should handle UTF-8 Hebrew, haven't tried) -- All together now Ira Abramov http://ira.abramov.org/email/ This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
msg25314/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
