On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Alex Shnitman, from the post of Tue, 11 Feb:
> >
> > If it's desired, and enough people are willing to take on the job, I
> > guess we can set this list up as a moderated list, but I don't think
> > that everybody will agree to do this.
>
> did I saywe should moderate EVERY post? I just think that off-topic
> posts that already pass through a moderation stage should be filtered
> out, and a question about Oracle and Veritas should be off topic on this
> list, doubly so if asked by a non-participant (inother words, it's
> semi-OK if asked by someone who gives back to the list on ON-TOPIC
> subjects).
Can anyone remind me why Linux-IL was set up to receive messages from
non-subscribers (subject to human moderator's approval) in the first
place?
If there is no good reason, how about reconfiguring the list to reject all
messages from non-subscribers? Then Alex Shnitman will not have to spend
time approving messages from non-subscribers.
--- Omer
My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine alone.
They do not represent the official policy of any organization with which
I may be affiliated in any way.
WARNING TO SPAMMERS: at http://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
