-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 24 August 2003 12:18, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:36:30PM +0300, Erez Doron wrote:
> > > i installed kernel-source-2.4.20-20.9-i686.rpm
> > > i linked the main dir to /usr/src/linux ( was already linked to
> > > /usr/src/linux-2.4)
>
> And what is /usr/src/linux-2.4? Maybe that was a symlink to the
> previous version of the kernel, and you would be better off with
> changing that, since your new kernel is still 2.4. But that is not
> material to your question.
>
> > /usr/src/linux should point to the headers glibc was compiled
> > against. You shouldn't touch it unless you really know what you're
> > doing.
>
> Muli, I think you are confusing it with /usr/include/linux. Linux
> stopped caring about /usr/src/linux a while ago, so there is no real
> harm in making it a symlink to the real tree. There is also no need to
> do that - I just checked and the system I am currently on has no
> /usr/src/linux at all.

Thats not always true, for example in Gentoo if you choose to compile a NPTL 
enabled glibc /usr/src/linux MUST point to a recent 2.6 kernel tree, also the 
nvidia binary driver compiles against headers from /usr/src/linux, basically 
this done so you can switch kernels and recompile binary (or not binary like 
ALSA) drivers with ease.
- -- 
Alex Veber
Gentoo Linux Developer
Rosh - Haa'in
Israel
Key fingerprint = 00BA 3837 906E CDA1 B83A  0535 D10E 5451 D8A7 253E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/SOlA0Q5UUdinJT4RAlyYAKDIoLIbrjBm0XNrWumz7DMsoTL1EACeIkxl
qj+RFCMredJu0zUde1ksTBE=
=Gk92
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

================================================================To unsubscribe, send 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to