On Friday 29 August 2003 12:02, Idan Sofer wrote:
> On יום שישי, 29 באוגוסט 2003, 11:30, you wrote:
> > opaque window moving, or even simple
> > redraws take way to much on my not-so-antique Duron 700Mhz. every single
> > non X solution I tried can do any graphics faster then X.
>
> If I can remember correctly, opaque window moving cab be partly done in
> hardware, the ability to quickly copy large sections of video ram(BitBlt?)
> is provided by 2D accellrated graphic cards for years now, and XFree86 use
> this facility if available.
>
> In fact I just did a small test, on my P3 700 I can move this pixmap-themed
> KMail window quite smoothly.

I have Voodoo3 card on my Duron (700MHz,256MB) which is a very good 3D card 
(for its age) and also has some 2D acceleration. moving any kind of window - 
even simple single color boxes results in visible artifact trails. redraw 
under normal load (few applications idling) is noticeable (less then a second 
of delay) and under heavy load it is painstakingly slow.

I haven't run M$-Win on it for a long time so I can't compare, but I'm pretty 
sure it behaves better - it does so on my two work computers which feature an 
identical P4/NVidia setup, and X is tons of time slower then the XP interface 
with full graphic ickiness.

Granted M$ has better drivers for the both setups, but it shouldn't be that 
noticeable as long as I'm not doing 3D.

-- 
Oded


================================================================To unsubscribe, send 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to