Dan Fruehauf wrote:

On Thursday 25 September 2003 02:42, Sagi Bashari wrote:
Hello,
I have a sollution which confronts the problem in a totally different way.
Given the time and resources, what you can do is connect both servers to a NAS switch, mapping them the same storage.

It's a possible solution, but:


1. The NAS is still a single point of failure.
2. They are talking about having a server at a different location,
so they'll need to replicate the NAS as well.

My suggestion for a general direction to investigate:

1. Check rsync more closely - as far as I remember from using it, it
is actually a very efficient program in CPU, memory, and network
usage.

2. What about using a content-management (CM) solution which manages
your site instead of handling files "manualy"? Keeping track of your
files through a CM software will enable it to copy over every file
when it's updated, and it can also sort-of track changes and versions.
I can't recall a particular software for this, maybe you can start
by looking for WebDAV implementations (e.g. Apache's WebDAV module).

--Amos



=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to