I believe that 
  
    asyncmap 0

is required in order to get connected to the Internet through ActCom,
both on dial up and ADSL lines.
  The point is that Debian's latest suggestion for 
/etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider asserts the following:

    # RFC 2516, paragraph 7 mandates that the following options MUST NOT be
    # requested and MUST be rejected if requested by the peer:
    # Address-and-Control-Field-Compression (ACFC)
    noaccomp
    # Asynchronous-Control-Character-Map (ACCM)
    default-asyncmap

Am I right in saying that according to Debian's assertion, asyncmap 0 
is in contradiction with RFC 2516? Is Debian wrong? I wonder what made
Debian mentions this only recently.
-- 

    Shaul Karl,    shaulk @ actcom . net . il

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to