On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
>
> > Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
> > downsides of each approach.
> >
> > gtk:
> > * not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop language)
> > * looks funkey on win32
> >
> > qt:
> > * not free in win32
> Actually it is now.
>
Free as in speech? I don't think so. Care to enlighten us?
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
> Ely
>
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/
Writing a BitKeeper replacement is probably easier at this point than getting
its license changed.
Matt Mackall on OFTC.net #offtopic.
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
