Nadav, Can you test it the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL way? So we know if it can be the same problem?
behdad On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote: > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote about "Re: Redhat 9 slowness - > continued": > > There was a recent thread on lkml about locking suckage with the NPTL > > libraries. I haven't followed too closely, but it might be relevant: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106797325227861&w=2 > > (thread beginning, it gets interesting around the middle). > > Interesting thread. Especially interesting is > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106798571412279&w=2 > > and a claim that this was fixed in the current glibc version (but not > in any distribution): > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106798991616656&w=2 > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106801636804413&w=2 > > I don't know yet if this is the same problem that I saw, or a completely > different problem. > > > ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
