On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:03:23PM +0200, Ilan Finci wrote: > Is there a way to protect such executable/library, so it will be hard to > do reverse engineering and find out what the algorithms we use? Of > course, we protect ourself with patents, but we would like something in > the level of protecting the code itself.
There was an elegant proof given at one of the HRL seminars last year that any obfuscator can be beaten. I can find the references if anyone wants them. Not what you asked, I know, but what the hell did you expect from this list? Cheers, Muli -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/ "the nucleus of linux oscillates my world" - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
