On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 06:24:02PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote: > > But they don't. instead they have memory addresses and the function name. so > I've been thinking - suppose I have a binary with debugging information, and > the source code and a stack trace - shouldn't I be able to extrapolate from > it in what line in the code each frame in the stack is ?
Of course. disassemble each function, and correlate memory address in the disassembly to the memory address you have. Am I missing something? Cheers, Muli -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/ "the nucleus of linux oscillates my world" - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
