On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:21:29AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > >From looking at the source I could only ssee that it means "something is > fishy".
0 order allocation failed means the kernel couldn't allocate even one page of memory. Unless the machines are pretty much out of memory, that should never happen. > In one case replacing reiserfs with ext3 made the problem go away. > Naturally this is a drastic solution that I don't want to take. > > Anybody seen this lately? Actually, yes, on lkml, unless my memory is playing tricks on me. But I don't remember the details, sorry. Try the archives... Which kernel is this with? Cheers, Muli -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/ "the nucleus of linux oscillates my world" - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
