> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 03:24:30PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> > Just a small linguistic nit-pick: The name "Autoconf" comes from the
> > shortening of "Automatic Configure", not of "Automatic Confiscate".

That's obvious, but the whole point of calling this "autoconfiscation" is a
jargon for applying the whole toolchain on some inocent code base.

On Saturday 21 February 2004 03:14, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> And the process is ireversable. Once you've done it you lose any hope of
> having a readable makefile.

Right on point -- we treat them just as a C programmer treats assembly files
(important knowhow, but not everyday food), or as a veteran sendmail
administrator treat 'sendmail.cf' (oh, how we used to write those files back
when we didn't use M4...)

-- 
Oron Peled                             Voice/Fax: +972-4-8228492
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                  http://www.actcom.co.il/~oron

"We continue to live in a world where all our know-how is locked into
binary files in an unknown format. If our documents are our corporate
memory, Microsoft still has us all condemned to Alzheimer's."
              -- Simon Phipps


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to