On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:32:47PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:47:22PM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:30, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > > I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
> > 
> > I guess you mean a *new* version of apache, ssh etc. Otherwise you could
> > simply install the original RH-6.2 RPMS.
> > 
> 
> If I could find them it would help ;-) I managed to find a cd lying
> around but there is no ssh or apache on it. Couldn't find a version for
> anything earlier then 7.2 on the net.

ftp.redhat.com is known to carry all production versions of RH,
beginning with 1.0(?) at
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/1.0/en/os/i386

What you need is either
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.2/en/iso/i386/ or
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.2/en/os/i386/

> 
> > > Anyway, is it possible to upgrade it in place to red-hat 7/9/fc or to debian
> > 
> > In place upgrade across several versions (e.g: RH-6.2 -> RH-8) is pretty
> > hopless. More so across distros.
> > 
> 
> I will do it across distros only if I need to do a clean install to
> save me the time of learning a new one. I guess that a clean install
> would be the smartest choice here.
> 
> I am looking for the path of least resistance here, its not a job, just
> something I know how to do.

It seems that upgrading would cause more problems than re-installation.
I wouldn't do it unless it were my own system and I had some extra time
for it.

> 
> > > or should I just make a clean install over it
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > What you need to check is if they have important data or local applications
> > and evaluate them before moving (on a modern Linux of your choice).
> > E.g: do they have web-apps on the old apache version and would they run
> > with the new one (mod_perl, php versions etc.).
> > 
> 
> There is a cgi (written in perl) from around 99 they want to use, I am
> not sure about the various dependencies, but does use perl 5 so I hope
> 5.8 will work just as well. Its supposed to handle paper submissions for
> a conference. I guess if there is another solution that works they will
> be ok with it since I don't think much work was done apart then
> downloading the code.

In the worst case build perl 5.005 from source and install it on 
/usr/local/ as perl.5005

> 
> I know it does need msql but they said they have a version that came

msql or mysql?

> with the code though.

> > Search the archive for a thread about partitioning practices (~1 month
> > ago?)
> 
> I guess I am rather locked into the partition scheme if I don't want to
> kill /home ;-)

Not if you reinstall . You can easily move the files from /boot to the
root partition and kill the /boot partition without even shutting down
the system. Growing root to instclude the extra 1.5 GB would require a
boot to a different root filesystem. However converting it to var would
only require 'telinit 1'

But you're going to re-install it anyway, so you could use that
opurtunity to reshape / , /boot and the swap partition to your liking.
(See that thread about partitioning for advices regarding your liking).

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen                       +---------------------------+
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/ |vim is a mutt's best friend|
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]       +---------------------------+

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to