Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Shlomi Fish wrote:

Note that this was constructive criticism. It's OK to make a mistake like that once, but please don't repeat it.

Regards,

Shlomi Fish


I don't know whether Gilad understood this or not, but I have to admit I didn't.

This song was not pornographic.

True.

It was neither advocating, not really putting down, porn on the
Internet. All it did was present two main characters, one saying that
the Internet is great for lots of things, and the other saying that
those things are almost exclusively porn.

I got the impression that overall, the song was definitely in favor of
the latter character, introducing the former only to prove her wrong.
I might be mistaken, so if you don't share my impression, you need not give weight to my complaint.


In other words, the only
difference between the song discussed here, and this discussion, in
terms of appropiratness is that the song was also amusing.

Granted.  The song's style of performance was obviously intended to
amuse and the whole point could be understood as irony (which I missed).

Now, can you please let me know what it is that was inappropriate about it?

            Shachar


-- Beni Cherniavsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Note: I can only read email on week-ends...

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to