On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:03:41 +0200
Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wednesday 26 January 2005 18:04, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:52:14 +0200
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yedidyah Bar-David) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:25:58AM +0200, Ira Abramov wrote:
> > > > Quoting Tzafrir Cohen, from the post of Wed, 26 Jan:
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:28:12PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > > > > > first also makes people use c++ as a functional language instead of
> > > > > > as
> >
> > an OO
> >
> > > > > > language.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just to get the terminology right: I figure you meant "procedural".
> > > >
> > > > every 9-12 months, this argument about the best first language comes
> > > > up. half of the people arguing with opinions they won't gudge from and
> > > > half trying to throw in half-knowledgable remarks to show they too
> > > > exist, and never does anyone agree.
> > > >
> > > > so allow me to add to the tradition! Python, gentlemen! it can be OO or
> > > > Procedural (and even pure functional I was once told). the syntax is
> > > > clean, very little syntactic sugar, no odd compilersyntax for a newbie
> > > > to learn, richer than Java, clearer than C and C++, and more widely
> > > > used in the practical world than Pascal or LISP.
> > >
> > > And, may I add, has a nice, free book, called "Learning with Python".
> > > Maybe not as deep as "Structure and Interpretation ...", but not bad
> > > either.
> >
> > Notice that "Structure and Interpretation ..." is not a lisp book, it used
> > lisp as a tool. Will have to look at learning python though, always
> > wondered if its going to be useful enough for me to spend the time
> > learning, although I think that for my work I am stuck with matlab and c
> > (really don't feel like learning fortran at this point ;-)
> >
> 
> Well, Perl, Python and friends can be used for many tasks for which neiter 
> Matlab nor C would be very suitable. Things like text processing and 
> generation, GUI programming, system administration, database handling, 
> networking, etc.
> 
> Of course, the combination of Matlab and C would be more suitable for 
> different tasks. I used Matlab extensively at the Technion, and I was very 
> impressed by the ease of programming certain tasks by translating them to  
> tensors' manipulation. Of course, Matlab as a language (from the CS 
> point-of-view) sucks pretty badly and it also has a very limited debugger.
> 
> There is a Perl extension called PDL (= Perl Data Language), which aims to 
> supply Perl with the same functionality as Matlab and similar programs. 
> (http://pdl.perl.org/). I suppose there are similar extensions for other 
> agile languages. 
> 

Worked a bit with PDL and it was nice, IIRC there is a similar extension
to python, but I have no experience with it. There is scilab which is a nice
free matlab like environment. I don't have much experience with it wither but it
seems better then octave.

There are also numerous libraries for c (a lot of them written in fortran BTW)
which allow you to do almost anything.

I'm somewhat stuck with matlab, with occasional excursions to c though since I
need to collaborate with others.

> BTW, I heard from some people who wrote programs in Matlab for their projects 
> and home-assignments, that took hours on end to run. My programs never took a 

Depends on how they wrote them and how heavy the computation is. I have well
written programs that can run for several hours but considering the program
built a 50,000x50,000 matrix and then computed the first 3000 eigenvalues I
think three hours is a short time.

> lot of time to run, but then again, I knew how to translate them into 
> efficient Matrix manipulations. Is it normal for some Matlab program to take 
> a lot of time to run, even if it's well-written, or does this indicate Matlab 
> illiteracy? 
> 

If you write your code to use matrix notation it will run rather fast. Matlab
can be rediculosly slow with loops. I tried writing the same code using matrix
notation and loops and it turned out to be a difference of a few seconds
compared to over an hour.

BTW matlab also has a profiler and you can alway use the internal compiler to
make faster running executables.

> (Matlab is interpreted by default, but its matrix operations and many 
> built-in-functions are hard-coded.)
> 

You can also write extenssions in c and java.

> Regards,
> 
>       Shlomi Fish
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Shlomi Fish      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepage:        http://www.shlomifish.org/
> 
> Knuth is not God! It took him two days to build the Roman Empire.
> 
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  
>  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
>  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
> 

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to