Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My memory claims there is an option to set inline according to > complexity, but then my memory tends to invent things it wants (a hot > sun for example).
That exists, as well as -finline-limit=N. However, Shachar's effect seems weird, assuming it is normal inlined class members he is talking about. I just tried a trivial program with gcc-3.2.3-42 gdb-6.1post-1.20040607.17 on RHEL WS 3 (sorry, cannot reproduce the environment here), and I was able to step through class members without -O, but not with -O. I expected this. I also restore the ability to step through class members if I use -O -fno-default-inline. However, Shachar, what are those inlines exactly? You mentioned std::string and auto_ptrs. Are you dealing with templates? Things can get tricky that way. Can you post a trivial code example that exhibits the problem? At least we'll be able to try that on different versions of g++. I assume that you cannot step through with either ddd or gdb, right? (IIRC ddd has gdb inside and presumably does not do anything on its own accord). -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.goldshmidt.org ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
